Thanks for this fix - works for me!
Nonetheless there is still another issue with such kind of messages: In the message list, attachments are not indicated (the 'paper clip' icon is missing).
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany
Am 15.11.2013 18:58, schrieb GitHub:
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail Commit: f8101fff1ec4a52bde553e77a120fd8618c025aa
https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/commit/f8101fff1ec4a52bde553e77a1... Author: Thomas Bruederli thomas@roundcube.net Date: 2013-11-15 (Fri, 15 Nov 2013)
Changed paths: M program/lib/Roundcube/rcube_message.php
Log Message:
Accept text/html parts inside multipart/mixed parts as HTML contents
Roundcube SVN commits mailing list svn@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/svn
Michael Heydekamp wrote:
Thanks for this fix - works for me!
Nonetheless there is still another issue with such kind of messages: In the message list, attachments are not indicated (the 'paper clip' icon is missing).
I guess you have to live with this tiny glitch. The attachment icon is "detected" by analyizing the Content-Type header of the message. In the case you're probably referring to, the content-type is multipart/alternative with a nested multipart/mixed which would indicate the existence of attachments. Thus the detection misses this one.
But for message listing we only fetch the headers of the messages from IMAP and analyzing the entire structure of each message would be too expensive in message listing just for the sake of displaying an icon.
~Thomas
Am 17.11.2013 15:49, schrieb Thomas Bruederli:
But for message listing we only fetch the headers of the messages from IMAP and analyzing the entire structure of each message would be too expensive in message listing just for the sake of displaying an icon.
Understood - except that you wouldn't have to do analyze the structure of EACH message - just of those multipart/* (or even multipart/alternative only) messages, right?
May I ask with regards to "too expensive": How many milliseconds approx. are we talking about? This is a serious question.
I would very much prefer to have this fixed, as I'm often "scanning" the list of messages with my eyes, explicitely looking for messages with attachments.
Michael Heydekamp Co-Admin freexp.de Düsseldorf/Germany