Hi,
folder nesting beyond one level is broken in svn-293.
In svn-282, my folders are listed correctly:
Lists --FOSS ----Roundcube ------devel ------users
In svn-293, they look like this:
Lists --FOSS --devel --users --roundcube
cheers, mtu
On Aug 6, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Michael Bueker wrote:
Hi,
folder nesting beyond one level is broken in svn-293.
In svn-282, my folders are listed correctly:
Lists --FOSS ----Roundcube ------devel ------users
In svn-293, they look like this:
Lists --FOSS --devel --users --roundcube
I noticed this in 291 and opened a ticket 3 days ago.
http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/ticket/1483922
-- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
This is obviously the result of this change: http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/changeset/290 Seems to me that this bug is bigger than the bug that it was intended to fix, so I'll roll back this change.
-Charles
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Aug 6, 2006, at 9:14 AM, Michael Bueker wrote:
Hi,
folder nesting beyond one level is broken in svn-293.
In svn-282, my folders are listed correctly:
Lists --FOSS ----Roundcube ------devel ------users
In svn-293, they look like this:
Lists --FOSS --devel --users --roundcube
I noticed this in 291 and opened a ticket 3 days ago.
http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/ticket/1483922
-- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Charles McNulty wrote:
This is obviously the result of this change: http:// trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/changeset/290 Seems to me that this bug is bigger than the bug that it was
intended to fix, so I'll roll back this change.
Do you expect this will be in 298? I just tried 297 and apparently
it has not been committed yet.
Thanks,
-- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
The 290 change was rolled back in 295. Firefox is showing three levels fine for me.
-Charles
Jason Dixon wrote:
On Aug 6, 2006, at 11:21 AM, Charles McNulty wrote:
This is obviously the result of this change: http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/changeset/290 Seems to me that this bug is bigger than the bug that it was intended to fix, so I'll roll back this change.
Do you expect this will be in 298? I just tried 297 and apparently it has not been committed yet.
Thanks,
-- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
On Aug 6, 2006, at 3:02 PM, Charles McNulty wrote:
The 290 change was rolled back in 295. Firefox is showing three
levels fine for me.
Oops, you're right. I was logging into the wrong one of two sites
I'm using RC with. Looks fine with 297.
-- Jason Dixon DixonGroup Consulting http://www.dixongroup.net
-
Charles McNulty -
Jason Dixon -
Michael Bueker