Users

users@lists.roundcube.net

1 participants
2944 discussions

How to make roundcube show user quota information
by Krisztián Gulyás 08 Jan '12

08 Jan '12

Hello, Two weeks ago I also tried to ask you (with no success) but I would take a chance again. My problem is that our roundcube version does not show the quota usage information of the logged-in user. I managed to make exim-dovecot to create the maildirsize file. The location for a certain e-mail is: /home/<username>/imap/<domain>/<e-mail address name>/Maildir/maildirsize. For example the maildirsize file for test@ company.hu is located in /home/ownerOfTest/imap/company.hu/test /Maildir/maildirsize. I would like to make roundcube show the quota bar for logged in users. Could you help me? Best regards, Chris -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

2 2

force_https and session problems
by Fred Bacon 07 Jan '12

07 Jan '12

I just upgraded my company's Roundcube installation from 0.5.3 to 0.7, and I have an interesting problem. We have the force_https option set to true. In the past, if you went to the unencrypted address and tried to login, you would be redirected to the encrypted connection, and your login would succeed. Now, if you go to the http address and try to login, you are not redirected to the encrypted connection, and you get an error stating that "Your session is invalid or expired" when you try to login. Can anyone else confirm this error? It's not a show stopper, but it is a little annoying that the behavior is different. I'm sure to get complaints on Monday. *sigh* Thanks, Fred Bacon Aerodyne Research, Inc. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "A bus station is where a bus stops. A train station is where a train stops. On my desk, I have a work station…." — William Faulkner -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

4 3

Additional mailbox space
by paul＠shopterraforma.com 02 Jan '12

02 Jan '12

Hello, Recently my mailbox went from being 25% to 81% full very quickly. I use this email address for business so it's very important I add more mailbox space. How can I do so? Thank you, Paul -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

3 2

Address Book Groups and OpenLDAP
by f3isar 02 Jan '12

02 Jan '12

Hi, I'm having a little trouble with address book groups. I think I'm really looking for a little clarification on expected functionality and help with my current set up. I'm running Roundcube 0.7 with individual's contacts stored in an LDAP directory (OpenLDAP). For the most part it is working great - big thank you to the devs : ) I have a 'Private Address Book' and all contacts are listed under 'Contacts' in the next column, great. I can also add groups, which are then nested under the 'Private Address Book' and adding contacts to those groups seems to work well also. However, selecting one of the nested groups does not display any of the members under the 'Contacts' column - Should it?. There is a count at the bottom ('Contact 1 to 11 of 11', for example) but it is always one higher than the number of contacts in the group. Also, adding a group to the 'to' field when composing a message does not seem to work. Typing 'my g' brings up 'My Group (2)' correctly (apart from the number of contacts in the group) but when I select it, it is replaced with a ','. Here are the appropriate sections of my config, I'd be grateful of any help: $rcmail_config['ldap_public']['Private'] = array( 'name' => 'Private Address Book', 'hosts' => array('my.server.com'), 'port' => 389, 'use_tls' => true, 'ldap_version' => 3, 'user_specific' => true, 'base_dn' => 'ou=Address Book,cn=%fu,%dc', 'bind_dn' => 'cn=%fu,%dc', 'bind_pass' => '', 'search_base_dn' => '', 'search_filter' => '', 'search_bind_dn' => '', 'search_bind_pw' => '', 'search_dn_default' => '', 'auth_cid' => '', 'auth_method' => '', 'hidden' => false, 'searchonly' => false, 'writable' => true, 'LDAP_Object_Classes' => array("top", "person", "inetOrgPerson", "organizationalPerson", "evolutionPerson"), 'LDAP_rdn' => 'cn', 'required_fields' => array("cn", "sn"), 'search_fields' => array('cn'), 'sort' => 'cn', 'scope' => 'one', 'filter' => '(objectClass=evolutionPerson)', 'fuzzy_search' => true, 'vlv' => false, 'numsub_filter' => '(objectClass=organizationalUnit)', 'sizelimit' => '0', 'timelimit' => '0', 'referrals' => true|false, 'groups' => array( 'base_dn' => 'ou=Groups,cn=%fu,%dc', 'filter' => '(objectClass=groupOfNames)', 'object_classes' => array("top", "groupOfNames"), 'member_attr' => 'member', 'name_attr' => 'cn', As you can see, the structure of my LDAP directory is like this: ou=Address Book,cn=username(a)server.com,dc=server,dc=com ou=Groups,cn=username(a)server.com,dc=server,dc=com -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

1 0

RC 0.7 and LDAP groups filter problem
by Ismail YENIGUL 02 Jan '12

02 Jan '12

Hi, I am testing roundcube 0.7-stable. I configured LDAP Adressbook with the following groups properties: 'groups' => array( 'base_dn' => 'dc=mydomain', 'filter' => '(objectClass=rmailGroup)', 'object_classes' => array("top", "mailGroup"), 'member_attr' => 'rfc822member', // name of the member attribute, e.g. uniqueMember 'name_attr' => 'cn', // attribute to be used as group name ), I can see the users and groups emails in address book but not group members. When i click on group no member listed. After enabling rouncube debug, I saw the following LDAP query. It seems that RC users full dn as a filter value. [29-Dec-2011 17:20:55 +0200]: C: Search [(|(member=uid=user@test.com,ou=test.com,o=mail,dc=mydomain)(uniqueMember=uid=user@test.com,ou=test.com,o=mail,dc=mydomain)(*rfc822member=uid=user@test.com,ou=test.com,o=mail,dc=mydomain*))][dn: dc=mydomain] But the filter value must be username not full dn as above. Any idea? -- Ismail YENIGUL -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

3 6

idea of identities
by Tomas Macek 30 Dec '11

30 Dec '11

I'm using rcmail 0.7 from source. I setup everything but don't understand the identitities_level feature in main.inc.php and the identities generally. I want to create a new mail, but even if I have identities_level = 3, I can specify the From: address and even if I don't enter any, I'm noticed with message box, that I must enter some From: address. Why?? Because I can enter ANY address for example something like 'nonexistent(a)email.com' if I really want (the only domain part is checked). How is the idea of this? Am I missing something or do I have to configure something more? According to me, the textbox for entering ANY email address should be replaced with label 'myownemail(a)address.com' and link for editing identities should disappear... Thank you Best regards, Tomas -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

1 0

newbie
by Rolf Schumacher 30 Dec '11

30 Dec '11

New to roundcube and dovecot - bear with me if this questions are too basic. On Debian I got dovecot working for imap and pop3. Installed them with apt-get install ... Postfix has been running for a while. I configured dovecot to access the incoming mail from the correct location. Testet receiving mail with my mail client using pop. Stopped the mail client from periodically receiving mail. How can I see new incoming mail in roundcube Inbox? I checked that postfix has written new mail at the inbox location but dovecot does not update their indexes. Something simple is missing here I guess. -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

1 0

Re: [RCU] question regarding fieldmap for LDAP addressbook in RC 7
by feisar 29 Dec '11

29 Dec '11

> my question was, what do you see in the gui? > -> a dropdown left from the address? or even something like "Address"? > if you change the dropdown, do it not change? > or what does not work? > Andreas Hi, did this get resolved? I too am having trouble with the alternative work/home addresses. The email and phone number fields work as expected but there is no 'Add Field > Address' option (only email, phone and website in my case). I'm not really sure what the config should look like but here is mine (using the evolutionPerson schema). There are a couple of things commented out but that's just from previous experimentation: 'fieldmap' => array( // Roundcube => LDAP // Main information 'firstname' => 'gn', 'jobtitle' => 'businessRole', 'name' => 'cn', 'organization' => 'o', //'photo' => 'jpegPhoto', 'prefix' => 'title', 'surname' => 'sn', // Contact Properties 'email' => 'mail', 'phone:home' => 'homePhone', 'phone:work' => 'telephoneNumber', 'phone:mobile' => 'mobile', // Work address 'address:work' => 'street', //'zipcode:work' => 'postalCode', //'locality:work' => 'l', // Home address 'address:home' => 'homePostalAddress', //'zipcode:home' => 'postalAddress', //'locality:home' => 'otherPostalAddress', //'region:home' => 'st', //'country:home' => 'co', 'website' => 'labeledURI', // Personal information tab 'anniversary' => 'anniversary', 'birthday' => 'birthDate', 'manager' => 'managerName', 'spouse' => 'spouseName', // Notes tab 'notes' => 'note', ), Thanks -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

1 0

Config setting to default to compose new message in new window?
by Charles Marcus 28 Dec '11

28 Dec '11

Looked everywhere and can't find such a setting... Is there one? -- Best regards, Charles -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

1 0

Roundcube Licensing Update
by Thomas Bruederli 28 Dec '11

28 Dec '11

Hello folks As of January 2012 Roundcube will be licensed under the GNU General Public License (GPL) Version 3 or later (with exceptions for skins & plugins) while it was licensed under GPL (v2) before that change. Actually the license situation wasn't absolutely clear before because some parts of the Roundcube code didn't specify a version number of the GPL while others did. Those parts not specifying a version number could, according to the GPL license text, be considered as either version 2 or any later version. *Clarification and Preparation for the Future* Because of the incorporated numerous other components, the only options for licenses are in the GNU GPL family, namely GNU GPLv2, GNU GPLv3, GNU AGPLv3. In order to become license compatible with some of the newer technologies we would like to be able to use and to be well prepared for future development and integration we decided to officially change to GNU GPL "version 3 or any later version". Together with the change to GPLv3+ we also added the following exception to the Roundcube license agreement which explicitly excludes skins & plugins from the terms of the GPL: " This file forms part of the Roundcube Webmail Software for which the following exception is added: Plug-ins and Skins which merely make function calls to the Roundcube Webmail Software, and for that purpose include it by reference shall not be considered modifications of the software. If you wish to use this file in another project or create a modified version that will not be part of the Roundcube Webmail Software, you may remove the exception above and use this source code under the original version of the license. " This shall give a maximum flexibility to skin designers and plugin developers to choose any other license for their work or even to create commercial or proprietary components without being forced to publish them according to the strong copy-left requirements of the GPL. The original proposal and the following discussion about this license clarification can be read in our mailing list archive: http://lists.roundcube.net/mail-archive/dev/2011-11/0000040.html *Request for Agreement* Because the copyright in Roundcube is not consolidated, making these updates requires the agreement of all contributors to Roundcube. So if you have in the past contributed to Roundcube, we would very much like to ask for your explicit agreement with this path forward. We believe this primarily represents a clarification and an adjustment to what we practiced over the past years. But of course we cannot force anyone to agree, so for those who do not agree to this license update we still offer the choice to have their code removed from Roundcube. Please contact us in case you have serious objections against the GPLv3+ with exceptions for skins & plugins and you want your contributed code to be removed. Thanks for all your support, we're looking into an exciting future of Roundcube in the year 2012. Best, Thomas -- List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/users/ BT/9b404e9e

1 0

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Users