Hello:
I thing RCU list uses mailman as list manager (http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/)
Reply-To header is controled by config option "reply_goes_to_list" with defaults to not to add/modify Reply-To header. This setting is strongly recommended by mailman developpers. Still, I suppose it has benefits in some situations; it makes easier for an admin to make people to always reply to the list.
In first paragraph of http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html you can read this:
" Beware! Reply-To: munging is considered a religious issue and the policies you set here can ignite some of the most heated off-topic flame wars on your mailing lists. We'll try to stay as agnostic as possible, but our biases may still peak through. "
Definitely true.....
Best regards.
El 15/01/2014 2:14, Kaz Kylheku escribió:
Wake up and look at this:
Reply-To: Roundcube Users mailing list <users@lists.roundcube.net>The RCU mailing list stamps this idiocy on everything that passes through it.
The mailing list for mail-related software is doing Reply-To munging. What's wrong with this picture?
That explains why the same people think it's a good idea to have a "Reply List" button.
On 14.01.2014 17:02, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 15.01.2014 01:46, schrieb Kaz Kylheku:
I don't agree with "Reply All" doing a "Reply List" if a mailing list is detected. The proper way to reply to a mailing list is "Reply All". Which means ... *There is absolutely no need for a "Reply List" misfeature.* *For users who really want this, the button should be called "Click here to reply in a moronic way if you think that RFC stands for some sort of fried chicken franchise".*
WHICH RFC ARE YOU REFERING? THERE ARE *MANY* IN CASE OF EMAIL STANDARDS YOU ARE THE MORON!
Someone who thinks that RFC stands for some kind of R. Fried Chicken is obviously ignorant of all of them.
Roundcube Users mailing list users@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/users