Here we go ;)
I need help to understand the "global" meaning of this :
Mail-Reply-To
Mail-Followup-To
Mail-Reply-To
Mail-Followup-To
Add Mail-Reply-To
Add Mail-Followup-To
and the french translation will be done.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/rc/aW/L4TkKjwT/labels.inc
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
Hi,
Updated files attached.
regards,
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/rc/yy/oNUrXb3n/roundcube-ar.zip
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
After looking through the IMAP code, I am wondering why RoundCube uses it's
own homegrown IMAP code rather than the IMAP extension that is built into
PHP 5.
The current IMAP extension fully supports all the forms of authentication
supported by the current code, as well as additional ones such as GSSAPI[for
example,the pubkey/kerebos token question earlier]. As such, if RoundCube
has moved to PHP5 only, it would make sense to move the the IMAP extension.
I'm modifying the core code for my own use, including migrating those
libraries to use PHP's Imap extension as a configuration option - once done
I can certainly provide the patches if you want to add that code back to
core.
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:49:13 -0000, Roundcube Webmail wrote:
> #1487143: Name building in addcontact.inc
>
> -------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
> Reporter: andudi | Type: Feature Patches
> Status: closed | Priority: 5
> Milestone: 0.5-stable | Component: Addressbook
> Version: 0.4.2 | Severity: normal
> Resolution: wontfix | Keywords:
>
> -------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
> Changes (by alec):
>
> * status: new => closed
> * resolution: => wontfix
>
>
> Comment:
>
> I don't like it. Guessing the order of names is just wrong. Maybe it
> could
> be improved but not this way.
It was just my need, it fits 80% of my contacts, and the failing 20% I
have to edit later.
What do you suggest then? I am willing to improve it, but you must be
clearer what you would accept!
I could imagine a configurable name order as well...
thanks for feedback
Andreas
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
Translation update for European Portuguese (pt_PT) for "labels.inc" and
"messages.inc" with the new labels and messages.
Regards,
DC
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/rc/44/ubtW2q1L/messages.inchttp://detached.gigo.com/rc/44/ubtW2q1L/labels.inc
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
Hi!
I'm completing the Italian translation with the new strings, but I have
a couple of questions:
What's the behavior of the parenthesis for plural nouns?
For example, in English there is this string: "Message(s) deleted
successfully".
In Italian, the translation of the singular form is "Messaggio eliminato
con successo", while the plural form would be "Messaggi eliminati con
successo", so how should I write the translation? Unfortunately in
Italian the verb changes too....
And...what are exactly "Mail-Reply-To" and "Mail-Followup-To"?
Thank you for developing such an excellent piece of software!
Luca from Italy
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
Hello,
please find in attachment a patch for some italian translations missing.
Francesco Amelio
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
The following attachments have been detached and are available for viewing.
http://detached.gigo.com/rc/jF/crapu4Cf/patch_it.patch
Only click these links if you trust the sender, as well as this message.
--- 8< --- detachments --- 8< ---
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
I'm attempting to write a plugin to allow pubcookie sessions
to authenticate directly into roundcube without requiring any
additional login from the user. First of all, has anyone done
this already? It's not one of the standard plugins...
Assuming that pubcookie hasn't already been done, I've been
looking at the roundcube architecture for how to integrate it.
Unfortunately, if you use pubcookie, you get a userID and a
kerberos credential (instead of a userID/password combo), so
it looks like none of the standard roundcube hooks will do the
right thing. I already have code that will build a pre-authenticated
connection to my IMAP server, but I don't really see how to hand
this back to roundcube while bypassing the normal login/imap
connection building that is going on.
Can anyone provide some ideas on the best way to do this? I'd be
happy to contribute the eventual plugin back to the pool.
Thanks,
Tod Pike
--
Tod Pike
Manager of Enterprise Services
School of Computer Science
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 07:35:14 -0000, Roundcube Webmail wrote:
> #1487314: RC in a Frame do not work in 0.5-beta
>
> -------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
> Reporter: andudi | Type: Bugs
> Status: closed | Priority: 5
> Milestone: later | Component: User Interface
> Version: 0.5-beta | Severity: normal
> Resolution: worksforme | Keywords: frame dyndns
>
> -------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
> Changes (by alec):
>
> * status: new => closed
> * resolution: => worksforme
>
>
> Comment:
>
> Works for me. Move noframes tag outside of frameset. Also make sure
> that
> main and frame pages are using the same protocol. It will not work
> if main
> page uses http and frame uses https.
Hei Alec
I digged further and found: the problem occures only in Firefox
(Windows XP and Ubuntu 10.10), and it works well in IE, Konqueror and
Reqonk...
Again what I observing: Showing email do NOT work if RC 0.5-beta is
runned in DynDNS Webhop.
With RC 0.4.2 it works still well even with Firefox, and it works well with
the devel-addressbook (rev 4300) and with the demo (version?) at
http://mail4us.net/?_redirect=&_task=mail&_action=plugin.wrapper&_screen_wi…
so, it seems to be hard to debug.. I suggest a JS problem and I would try to
digg in the code, but I have no start point yet.
any suggestions?
thanks
Andreas
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
BT/aba52c80