Hello,
A fix for minor bug #1484091 (http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/ticket/1484091)
Diff explanation :
- program/steps/mail/compose.inc : to send 'bcc' data in the form.
- skins/default/templates/compose.html : to see 'bcc' field if it's
not empty.
Black Myst
Index: program/steps/mail/compose.inc
--- program/steps/mail/compose.inc (revision 416) +++ program/steps/mail/compose.inc (working copy) @@ -150,7 +150,10 @@ } case 'bcc': if (!$fname)
{ $fname = '_bcc';$header = 'bcc';} $allow_attrib = array('id', 'class', 'style', 'cols', 'rows', 'wrap', 'tabindex'); $field_type = 'textarea';
Index: skins/default/templates/compose.html
--- skins/default/templates/compose.html (revision 416) +++ skins/default/templates/compose.html (working copy) @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ var cc_field = document.form._cc; if (cc_field && cc_field.value!='') rcmail_toggle_display('compose-cc'); +var bcc_field = document.form._bcc; +if (bcc_field && bcc_field.value!='')
- rcmail_toggle_display('compose-bcc');
//--> </script>
Black.myst wrote:
A fix for minor bug #1484091 (http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/ticket/1484091)
Diff explanation :
- program/steps/mail/compose.inc : to send 'bcc' data in the form.
- skins/default/templates/compose.html : to see 'bcc' field if it's
not empty.
Works :)
~Mik
Hi All,
It's really hard as a follower of this group to determine when it would be a good time to grab the latest from Subversion. I've tried grabbing the latest a few times, but more often than not have had to roll back and go with the older version due to something not working properly.
It would therefore be awesome if there was some way for people to rate or mark various revisions and their luck with using them, to potentially save people wanting to try the latest from the hassle of finding a stable revision.
Perhaps this suggestion should go to the Trac guys instead, but let me know what you think first.
Yours, Morten
Hi Morten
In general, SVN trunk is not considered to be stable. From time to time we will publish SVN snapshots for download in the download section of the sourceforge page. The trunk is meant for testing and if you're just interested in the latest semi-stable version, please wait for the snapshots or official releases.
Regards, Thomas
Morten Mertner wrote:
Hi All,
It's really hard as a follower of this group to determine when it would be a good time to grab the latest from Subversion. I've tried grabbing the latest a few times, but more often than not have had to roll back and go with the older version due to something not working properly.
It would therefore be awesome if there was some way for people to rate or mark various revisions and their luck with using them, to potentially save people wanting to try the latest from the hassle of finding a stable revision.
Perhaps this suggestion should go to the Trac guys instead, but let me know what you think first.
Yours, Morten
Black.myst wrote:
A fix for minor bug #1484091 (http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/ticket/1484091)
I just committed this as SVN 417 but forgot to give you credit, sorry about that.
Robin
Hey,
I agree with Thomas on the revision system for roundcube. I tend to have a "good" snapshot on my server, and an experimental one, which I just copy the config files to. If the experimental snapshot works well enough, I make it my primary one.
But I also think the rating would be a cool feature to Trac. I think you should suggest it to them. Maybe the "quality" of a snapshot could be linked to the number of Bug tickets assigned to that revision.
Cheers, ~Mik
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:34:21 +0100, Morten Mertner morten@mertner.com wrote:
Hi All,
It's really hard as a follower of this group to determine when it would be a good time to grab the latest from Subversion. I've tried grabbing the latest a few times, but more often than not have had to roll back and go with the older version due to something not working properly.
It would therefore be awesome if there was some way for people to rate or mark various revisions and their luck with using them, to potentially save people wanting to try the latest from the hassle of finding a stable revision.
Perhaps this suggestion should go to the Trac guys instead, but let me know what you think first.
Yours, Morten
I agree with the rating system. Because the development of the svn proceeds so fast, there are many enticing features that makes one want to try out the svn and possibly use it in a production environment. Maybe every 10 release or so, we can have a usable release that people can try out to get the new features? Ofcourse we cannot expect every thing to work in this release, but for this stable release, we could remove the stuff we know doesn't work for sure and only add the new features / patches from the previous stable release.
Nipun Jain
On 12/20/06, Michael Bueker m.bueker@berlin.de wrote:
Hey,
I agree with Thomas on the revision system for roundcube. I tend to have a "good" snapshot on my server, and an experimental one, which I just copy the config files to. If the experimental snapshot works well enough, I make it my primary one.
But I also think the rating would be a cool feature to Trac. I think you should suggest it to them. Maybe the "quality" of a snapshot could be linked to the number of Bug tickets assigned to that revision.
Cheers, ~Mik
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:34:21 +0100, Morten Mertner morten@mertner.com wrote:
Hi All,
It's really hard as a follower of this group to determine when it would be a good time to grab the latest from Subversion. I've tried grabbing the latest a few times, but more often than not have had to roll back and go with the older version due to something not working properly.
It would therefore be awesome if there was some way for people to rate or mark various revisions and their luck with using them, to potentially save people wanting to try the latest from the hassle of finding a stable revision.
Perhaps this suggestion should go to the Trac guys instead, but let me know what you think first.
Yours, Morten
-
Black.myst -
Michael Bueker -
Morten Mertner -
Nipun Jain -
Robin Elfrink -
Thomas Bruederli