Dev

dev@lists.roundcube.net

1 participants
4289 discussions

Browser rendering error in Firefox on Mac
by Michael Bueker 26 Jul '06

26 Jul '06

Hi folks! A friend of mine who also uses roundcube reported this to me and gave me the attached screenshot. I have no Mac, so I can't try to reproduce it. I hope there's somebody who can look into this. mtu -- Is that an ICBM in your capital, or are you just happy to see me? - Civilization IV fan pickup line (by Llewen)

4 4

SVN errors
by Thomas Bruederli 26 Jul '06

26 Jul '06

Hi everybody, For all who experienced problems with the SVN repository, just note that those problems are fixed and you can checkout as usual. Thanks for your patience! Thomas

2 1

Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail
by WOODS John 26 Jul '06

26 Jul '06

So we need to create a new project called SquareSphere!!! -----Original Message----- From: Blane Bramble [mailto:blane@dialmediagroup.com] Sent: 26 July 2006 11:51 To: dev(a)lists.roundcube.net Subject: Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail WOODS John wrote: > I am inclined to agree with Michael on this. > > The timing of this offer is very interesting. Roundcube is very close to > an excellent beta 2 and full release cannot be more than six months > away. > > @mail is doing this on purely commercial grounds (nothing wrong with > that) but it would be sad to see such a good Open Source project > disappear as it surely would. > > However, I would like to understand what would happen to the source code > if Thomas should decide to sell. Who actually owns the code given that > at least a dozen people have contributed? > > Is it the case that the code will remain open even after he sells it and > therefore couldn't anyone else start a new project from what exists > already? > The existing GPL'd code remains under GPL - this cannot be removed, and so a new Open Source project could be forked under a new name (assuming the RoundCube name was part of the purchase).

2 1

Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail
by WOODS John 26 Jul '06

26 Jul '06

I am inclined to agree with Michael on this. The timing of this offer is very interesting. Roundcube is very close to an excellent beta 2 and full release cannot be more than six months away. @mail is doing this on purely commercial grounds (nothing wrong with that) but it would be sad to see such a good Open Source project disappear as it surely would. However, I would like to understand what would happen to the source code if Thomas should decide to sell. Who actually owns the code given that at least a dozen people have contributed? Is it the case that the code will remain open even after he sells it and therefore couldn't anyone else start a new project from what exists already? Whatever Thomas does that is his decision and we should all congratulate him on creating an outstanding webmail client and wish him well. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Bueker [mailto:m.bueker@berlin.de] Sent: 26 July 2006 11:23 To: Thomas Bruederli Cc: dev(a)lists.roundcube.net; Uwe(a)mtu.homelinux.net; Schaefer(a)mtu.homelinux.net Subject: Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:49:34 +0200, "Thomas Bruederli" <roundcube(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Just wanted to forward a mail I've got yesterday and would like to > hear your opinions about this topic. Either this could make RoundCube > grow faster or atmail just wants to get rid of some (more and more > serious) competition. I am totally opposed to this idea. First of all, it would damage roundcube's reputation insofar as there will always be the "better" commercial version of <whatever rounbcude+atmail would be called>. I am sure this would make less people want to even try roundcube. And frankly, I would prefer a smaller, less functional but totally free application over the open source branch of something commercial any day. Secondly, they are proposing to buy roundcube out, and if I understood correctly, they want to buy the license. That would not only mean that they'll use all of roundcube's features in their commercial product (which I'd simply oppose because the work wasn't meant to be aiding their profit), but also that they could un-open source the open source tree any day. Thirdly, they want to buy roundcube out. While that may be nice in terms of their business world, I think it's totally inappropriate, because it would be impossible to evenly distribute the money among everyone who's contributed to roundcube during its development. Call me an FOSS radical, but this offer violates my principles. Not that I have a lot to say, being new here, but still. I'd very much like roundcube to stay completely free as in speech. Cheers, mtu

3 2

Re: Fwd: Roundcube merger - Ideas from atmail
by Michael Bueker 26 Jul '06

26 Jul '06

On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 09:49:34 +0200, "Thomas Bruederli" <roundcube(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Just wanted to forward a mail I've got yesterday and would like to > hear your opinions about this topic. Either this could make RoundCube > grow faster or atmail just wants to get rid of some (more and more > serious) competition. I am totally opposed to this idea. First of all, it would damage roundcube's reputation insofar as there will always be the "better" commercial version of <whatever rounbcude+atmail would be called>. I am sure this would make less people want to even try roundcube. And frankly, I would prefer a smaller, less functional but totally free application over the open source branch of something commercial any day. Secondly, they are proposing to buy roundcube out, and if I understood correctly, they want to buy the license. That would not only mean that they'll use all of roundcube's features in their commercial product (which I'd simply oppose because the work wasn't meant to be aiding their profit), but also that they could un-open source the open source tree any day. Thirdly, they want to buy roundcube out. While that may be nice in terms of their business world, I think it's totally inappropriate, because it would be impossible to evenly distribute the money among everyone who's contributed to roundcube during its development. Call me an FOSS radical, but this offer violates my principles. Not that I have a lot to say, being new here, but still. I'd very much like roundcube to stay completely free as in speech. Cheers, mtu

1 0

BincIMAP Search Patch
by Jim Pingle 25 Jul '06

25 Jul '06

Is there anyone else around that is currently using BincIMAP? I have a BincIMAP server I'm forced to deal with in one setup, and the search feature fails in the default configuration, because BincIMAP doesn't understand UTF-8 and chokes when RoundCube sends the search query with UTF-8 specified as the charset. I have a patch that fixes this for me, but I'm sure it could use some more testing/comments/whatever. The ticket for this is #1483855 The patch is on the ticket: http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/attachment/ticket/1483855/bincimap_searc… Basically, if the search fails the first time it retries the search without a charset specified. Assuming I read the code right, this should only happen with a server error, not just an empty message set. (Another pair of eyes might help verify that...) Thanks, Jim

1 0

Final round for 0.1beta2
by Thomas Bruederli 25 Jul '06

25 Jul '06

Hi everybody I finally made it to go through the most tickets and assigned a set of bugs that IMO need to be fixed for the next milestone. There are now 16 pending tickets assigned to milestone 0.1beta2: http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=… It looks like I will have some time again to work on the project for the next couple of weeks. Let's try to get rid of those 16 tix and we're ready to publish a new release. This will also be the first release that is "planned" with the Trac system and a proof of success of that platform. Please catch yourself some unassigned tickets and help finish this milestone. Thanks! Thomas

11 17

Absolute URLs not working
by Steffen 24 Jul '06

24 Jul '06

After checking out of SVN today on build 280 with absolute URLs implemented, quite a few links don't work. Tested in Opera 9, Ubuntu 6.06, Linux 2.6.15, using SVN checkout 280 (as of today). When clicking 'Log out' I receive the following error (on URL ?_task=logout): SERVICE CURRENTLY NOT AVAILABLE! Error No. 1f4) Logs produce this line: PHP Error: Error loading template for 'logout' in /var/www/html/roundcubemail/program/include/main.inc on line 1129 My session is not terminated after this, i.e. it's impossible to log out. Furthermore, when hitting 'Preferences' I'm only able to view the main settings. Clicking 'Folders' and 'Identities' only changes the address of the page from ?_task=settings to ?_task=settings# Unless others report that build 280 is working fine in this respect, I'll file a bug report. If it works for others, please let me know, so that I can investigate further on my own server. Furthermore, the 'Send now' button doesn't work, and the 'Send email now' and 'Cancel buttons at the bottom of the Compose window don't work. (I had to send this email from Evolution, since my RC is currently not working). Best regards, Steffen

1 1

External Login
by Rob Gil 24 Jul '06

24 Jul '06

I think this is my first post on this list, but I've been lurking for some time now. My question is, how can I have an external login for logging into roundcube? I noticed there is some kind of hash in the url when logging in, how can I reproduce this? ~Rob

2 1

PHP Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent in Unknown on line 0
by Martin Marques 21 Jul '06

21 Jul '06

OK, I'm seeing to much of this error messages, and they are not related to the config files main.inc.php or db.inc.php. Some script has a new line at the end, after the closing "?>". Now, I have a proposle, backed up by a mail from Rasmus Leardorf: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=106896382030183&w=2 Why not get ride of the closing "?>" at the end of the scripts? -- --------------------------------------------------------- Lic. Martín Marqués | SELECT 'mmarques' || Centro de Telemática | '@' || 'unl.edu.ar'; Universidad Nacional | DBA, Programador, del Litoral | Administrador ---------------------------------------------------------

4 8

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Dev